Pulling current player details into TactiQ.
TactiQ Score, per-90 performance stats, and multi-season form — with direct routes into compare and rankings.

A Bundesliga goalkeeper sitting at 50.49 on the FQ scale — squarely in the typical-performer band — with limited sub-score data available to assess core shot-stopping or distribution quality. The most distinctive feature of this profile is not current output but a sharp upward form spike, with recent performances running well above the multi-season baseline. Data confidence is moderate at 0.71, meaning conclusions should be treated as directional rather than definitive.
The FQ score of 50.49 is driven primarily by the absence of goalkeeper-specific production signals — saves, save percentage, clean sheets, and goals prevented above expected are all missing from the sub-score profile. Without those dimensions, the model can only anchor to a neutral baseline, which is exactly where this player lands.
Form is on a clear upward trajectory: the form score of 61.86 sits 11.4 points above the FQ score of 50.49, the largest positive gap in this comparison group. If sustained, this momentum could push the overall score meaningfully higher — but data is approximately 2 days old, introducing minor staleness risk.
Both sit in the 50–54 FQ range with similarly thin sub-score profiles for goalkeepers; Escandell Banacloche scores marginally higher at 53.27, suggesting a slightly more established baseline of recorded output.
Top 50 players by TactiQ Score — filter by position, form, and confidence.
TactiQ Score, form, confidence, and season stats compared side by side — instantly.
Every TactiQ Score is deterministic and traceable. Read the full methodology behind the numbers.
Comparable FQ band at 53.74 and a similar positional profile; Dimitrievski's score edges higher, indicating a modest but consistent advantage in overall assessed contribution.
The ceiling comparison in this group at 54.71 FQ — in the same tier but with a more complete data profile, making Johnstone the clearest benchmark for what upward movement from this band looks like.
All role-critical sub-scores — shot-stopping, distribution, defensive actions — return null. Across 1,710 minutes and 19 matches this season, no saves, clean sheet, or xG-prevented data is available to evaluate core positional contribution. This is the central gap in the profile.
A 0–100 measure of overall quality. Combines statistical output with league difficulty, multi-season weighting, and a consistency factor. Target range for strong players: 70–85.
Weighted toward recent matches. Can diverge from the TactiQ Score when current form is meaningfully stronger or weaker than the multi-season average.
How much evidence supports this score. Lower confidence means thinner data — fewer seasons, fewer appearances, or gaps in coverage. A provisional score is real signal with appropriate caveats.
TactiQ Scores are deterministic — given the same evidence, they produce the same output. The evidence packet system, confidence labels, and publication gate are all explained in full.
Read the full methodology →