TactiQ
Sign InGet Started
TactiQ
Football Intelligence
Founding Beta

TactiQ is built around Player & Club Data, Match Intelligence, Predictive Modeling, and Research & Visualization — understand the system, not the surface.

Core
Club football as the permanent base
Launch
World Cup as the launch amplifier
Transparency
Public roadmap and visible system progress
The standard
Methodology →

Every score is deterministic, evidence-gated, and confidence-labelled. Football intelligence should be explainable — not a black box with a number on the front. The methodology is part of the product, not a legal page.

Deterministic scoringMulti-agent consensus gatedPublication gate active
Core
PlayersClubsMatchesWorld Cup 2026Roadmap
Product
CompareRankingsForecastMethodologyMembership
Legal
PrivacyTerms© 2026 TactiQ. All rights reserved.
Player Profile

Loading player profile...

Pulling current player details into TactiQ.

Player Profile

Gianluca Scamacca

TactiQ Score, per-90 performance stats, and multi-season form — with direct routes into compare and rankings.

Current Team
Atalanta
Position
Centre Forward
Also: Striker
Date of Birth
Jan 1, 1999 (27)
Jersey Number
#9
League
Serie A
Back to PlayersCompare PlayerOpen RankingsView Methodology
Gianluca Scamacca
Gianluca Scamacca
Current profile snapshot
Current Team
Atalanta
Position
Centre Forward
Also: Striker
Date of Birth
Jan 1, 1999 (27)
Jersey Number
#9
TactiQ Score
70.3
77% confidence
TactiQ Score v2
70.3
Form Score
71.7
Confidence
77%
Role
striker
League
Serie A
Per 90 minutes
Goals
0.69
Assists
0.07
Key Pass
1.17
Tackles
0.55
Rating
7.08
Multi-season trend
AI Analysis
Generated Apr 30, 2026

A mid-range Serie A striker sitting at 56.1 on the FQ scale — squarely in the typical performer band. With 0.62 goals per 90 and a 7.03 average rating across 1,162 minutes this season, the output is functional but unremarkable. All sub-scores are null, meaning this profile is built on per-90 and aggregate data alone, which limits the depth of evaluation.

Why this score

The FQ score of 56.1 reflects a striker producing at a baseline level without any sub-score dimension pulling the rating higher. The absence of finishing, creation, and progression sub-scores means no single area of elite output can be confirmed — the score is anchored by moderate per-90 numbers rather than any standout dimension.

Form Trajectory

Form is on an upward trajectory: the form score of 62.73 sits 6.6 points above the baseline FQ score of 56.1, clearing the 5-point threshold for a meaningful positive trend. However, with data marked as not fresh (50+ hours old) and all sub-scores null, the sustainability of this uptick cannot be confirmed across dimensions.

Similar Profiles
Players with comparable scoring profiles in the same role
Olivier Giroud

Both operate as physically present, hold-up-oriented strikers in Serie A with FQ scores in the 53–59 range; Giroud's higher FQ score (59.12) reflects a more established scoring record in this league context.

Compare →
André Miguel Valente Silva
Rankings
See where this player sits across all scored players.

Top 50 players by TactiQ Score — filter by position, form, and confidence.

Open Rankings →
Compare
Put this player next to another and find the real edges.

TactiQ Score, form, confidence, and season stats compared side by side — instantly.

Compare Player →
Methodology
Understand exactly how this score was built.

Every TactiQ Score is deterministic and traceable. Read the full methodology behind the numbers.

View Methodology →
Latest available season snapshot

Live statistics currently available for this profile

10 metrics surfaced
Appearances
23
Minutes
1309
Goals
10
Assists
1
Key passes
17
Rating
7.08
Tackles
8
Shots on target
23
Successful dribbles
13
Clean sheets
7
2 Seasons Ago
TQ 77.2Form 77.9
Previous
TQ 58.4Form 60.2
Current
TQ 69.5Form 71.7
Per 90 minutes
Goals
0.69
Assists
0.07
Key Passes
1.17
Tackles
0.55
Rating
7.08

Similar FQ score (53.66) and striker profile suggest comparable output levels; this player edges Silva marginally on per-90 goal rate but both sit in the typical performer band.

Compare →
Jordan Ayew

Ayew's FQ score of 51.73 is the closest floor comparison — both are fringe-to-adequate strikers by the FQ scale, though this player's 0.62 goals per 90 gives a slight edge in raw attacking output.

Compare →
Current indicators
What the live season sample is surfacing right now
Direct output
11 combined goals and assists are showing in live coverage.
Creative involvement
Current snapshot shows meaningful chance supply and final-third contribution.
Strengths
Where this player is genuinely above baseline
No clearly elite traits identified in current data.
Watchpoints
Real gaps relative to this player's role
Key pass volume

1.01 key passes per 90 is a workable contribution for a striker, but without a creation sub-score it is unclear whether this reflects genuine chance creation or incidental involvement. For a striker in Serie A, this alone does not elevate the profile.

Defensive contribution

0.54 tackles per 90 is above what most pure strikers register, but without a defense sub-score and given the striker role, it is unclear whether this reflects a pressing system requirement or genuine defensive engagement — and it does not compensate for the missing finishing data.

Reading the score

What each number means

TactiQ Score

A 0–100 measure of overall quality. Combines statistical output with league difficulty, multi-season weighting, and a consistency factor. Target range for strong players: 70–85.

Form Score

Weighted toward recent matches. Can diverge from the TactiQ Score when current form is meaningfully stronger or weaker than the multi-season average.

Confidence

How much evidence supports this score. Lower confidence means thinner data — fewer seasons, fewer appearances, or gaps in coverage. A provisional score is real signal with appropriate caveats.

Methodology

TactiQ Scores are deterministic — given the same evidence, they produce the same output. The evidence packet system, confidence labels, and publication gate are all explained in full.

Read the full methodology →