TactiQ
Sign InGet Started
TactiQ
Football Intelligence
Founding Beta

TactiQ is built around Player & Club Data, Match Intelligence, Predictive Modeling, and Research & Visualization — understand the system, not the surface.

Core
Club football as the permanent base
Launch
World Cup as the launch amplifier
Transparency
Public roadmap and visible system progress
The standard
Methodology →

Every score is deterministic, evidence-gated, and confidence-labelled. Football intelligence should be explainable — not a black box with a number on the front. The methodology is part of the product, not a legal page.

Deterministic scoringMulti-agent consensus gatedPublication gate active
Core
PlayersClubsMatchesWorld Cup 2026Roadmap
Product
CompareRankingsForecastMethodologyMembership
Legal
PrivacyTerms© 2026 TactiQ. All rights reserved.
Player Profile

Loading player profile...

Pulling current player details into TactiQ.

Player Profile

Cody Gakpo

TactiQ Score, per-90 performance stats, and multi-season form — with direct routes into compare and rankings.

Current Team
Liverpool
Position
Left Wing
Also: Winger
Date of Birth
May 7, 1999 (27)
Jersey Number
#18
League
Premier League
Back to PlayersCompare PlayerOpen RankingsView Methodology
Cody Gakpo
Cody Gakpo
Current profile snapshot
Current Team
Liverpool
Position
Left Wing
Also: Winger
Date of Birth
May 7, 1999 (27)
Jersey Number
#18
TactiQ Score
71.6
96% confidence
TactiQ Score v2
71.6
Form Score
68.6
Confidence
96%
Role
winger
League
Premier League
Per 90 minutes
Goals
0.24
Assists
0.17
Key Pass
1.78
Tackles
1.01
Rating
7.10
Multi-season trend
AI Analysis
Generated May 9, 2026

A Premier League winger sitting at 67.28 — solidly in the adequate-starter tier, producing 0.22 goals and 0.19 assists per 90 alongside 1.82 key passes per 90, which reflects consistent but not elite attacking output. The absence of granular sub-scores limits deeper profiling, but the 0.92 confidence rating across 2,418 minutes (32 matches) means the overall picture is reliable.

Why this score

The TQ Score of 67.28 is anchored by a solid per-90 production profile for a winger — particularly 1.82 key passes per 90 — but the lack of sub-scores in finishing, creation, and progression prevents any single dimension from pulling the rating higher. The score reflects competent, consistent role execution rather than a standout quality.

Form Trajectory

Form score of 62.66 sits 4.62 points below the TQ Score of 67.28 — within the ±5 stable range but nudging toward soft decline territory. The trend is worth monitoring over the next 3–4 matches to determine whether this is a temporary dip or the start of a more meaningful drop.

Similar Profiles
Players with comparable scoring profiles in the same role
Nicolas Pépé

Nearly identical TQ Score (66.64 vs 67.28) reflecting a similar profile of capable but inconsistent Premier League winger output; Pépé's career arc suggests a higher ceiling that was rarely sustained, which may be a relevant caution here.

Compare →
Matìas Soulè Malvano
Rankings
See where this player sits across all scored players.

Top 50 players by TactiQ Score — filter by position, form, and confidence.

Open Rankings →
Compare
Put this player next to another and find the real edges.

TactiQ Score, form, confidence, and season stats compared side by side — instantly.

Compare Player →
Methodology
Understand exactly how this score was built.

Every TactiQ Score is deterministic and traceable. Read the full methodology behind the numbers.

View Methodology →
Latest available season snapshot

Live statistics currently available for this profile

10 metrics surfaced
Appearances
34
Minutes
2585
Goals
7
Assists
5
Key passes
51
Rating
7.10
Tackles
29
Shots on target
21
Successful dribbles
34
Clean sheets
9
2 Seasons Ago
TQ 70.4Form 71.3
Previous
TQ 70.6Form 71.2
Current
TQ 68.8Form 68.6
Per 90 minutes
Goals
0.24
Assists
0.17
Key Passes
1.78
Tackles
1.01
Rating
7.10

Close scoring peer at 65.99, both operating in the adequate-starter band; Soulè Malvano trends younger with more upside potential, making him the more projection-friendly comparable.

Compare →
Jarrod Bowen

The nearest upper bound at 68.69 — a useful benchmark for what incremental improvement in this role looks like; Bowen's stronger goal contribution rate distinguishes him from this player's current output level.

Compare →
Current indicators
What the live season sample is surfacing right now
Heavy minute load
2585 minutes suggest a significant current role in the squad rotation.
Direct output
12 combined goals and assists are showing in live coverage.
Creative involvement
Current snapshot shows meaningful chance supply and final-third contribution.
Defensive activity
29 tackles indicate active intervention volume in the current season sample.
Strengths
Where this player is genuinely above baseline
No clearly elite traits identified in current data.
Watchpoints
Real gaps relative to this player's role
Goal contribution rate

0.22 goals and 0.19 assists per 90 gives a combined 0.41 goal contributions per 90 — functional for a Premier League winger but below the threshold expected of a primary attacking threat in this role.

Defensive engagement

1.04 tackles per 90 is a meaningful number for a winger and suggests defensive tracking duties, but without a defense sub-score it is unclear whether this reflects positional discipline or simply high-pressure defensive recovery.

Reading the score

What each number means

TactiQ Score

A 0–100 measure of overall quality. Combines statistical output with league difficulty, multi-season weighting, and a consistency factor. Target range for strong players: 70–85.

Form Score

Weighted toward recent matches. Can diverge from the TactiQ Score when current form is meaningfully stronger or weaker than the multi-season average.

Confidence

How much evidence supports this score. Lower confidence means thinner data — fewer seasons, fewer appearances, or gaps in coverage. A provisional score is real signal with appropriate caveats.

Methodology

TactiQ Scores are deterministic — given the same evidence, they produce the same output. The evidence packet system, confidence labels, and publication gate are all explained in full.

Read the full methodology →