Pulling current player details into TactiQ.
TactiQ Score, per-90 performance stats, and multi-season form — with direct routes into compare and rankings.

A Premier League goalkeeper sitting at 66.62 on the FQ scale — an adequate starter whose output places them in the mid-tier of scored players, not among the league's elite shot-stoppers. Across 27 matches and 2,308 minutes this season, performance has been consistent rather than standout, with a form score of 65.77 tracking almost exactly with the overall FQ score. Data confidence is high at 0.84, so this reading is well-grounded.
The FQ score of 66.62 is driven primarily by consistent, baseline-level goalkeeper output without any elite-tier differentiators. Granular role-specific metrics — save percentage, xG prevention, distribution — are not available in this data packet, meaning the score reflects composite reliability rather than a specific standout dimension.
Form score of 65.77 sits just 0.85 points below the FQ score of 66.62 — well within the ±5 stable band. No meaningful decline or upward momentum is present; output is flat and predictable.
Near-identical FQ score of 66.74 places them at the same tier this season; Alisson's reputation and historical peak far exceed what this current score reflects, highlighting how form-based scoring can converge players across different calibre profiles.
Top 50 players by TactiQ Score — filter by position, form, and confidence.
TactiQ Score, form, confidence, and season stats compared side by side — instantly.
Every TactiQ Score is deterministic and traceable. Read the full methodology behind the numbers.
FQ score of 66.27 makes Dúbravka the closest comparable in terms of current output level; both sit in the adequate-starter band, though Dúbravka's role as a backup/rotation keeper gives his score a different positional context.
FQ score of 66.21 reflects a similar mid-tier consistency profile; Gazzaniga operates in a lower-pressure environment than a full Premier League starter, making the score convergence notable.
A 0–100 measure of overall quality. Combines statistical output with league difficulty, multi-season weighting, and a consistency factor. Target range for strong players: 70–85.
Weighted toward recent matches. Can diverge from the TactiQ Score when current form is meaningfully stronger or weaker than the multi-season average.
How much evidence supports this score. Lower confidence means thinner data — fewer seasons, fewer appearances, or gaps in coverage. A provisional score is real signal with appropriate caveats.
TactiQ Scores are deterministic — given the same evidence, they produce the same output. The evidence packet system, confidence labels, and publication gate are all explained in full.
Read the full methodology →