Pulling current player details into TactiQ.
TactiQ Score, per-90 performance stats, and multi-season form — with direct routes into compare and rankings.

A Ligue 1 center-back sitting at 47.99 on the FQ scale — squarely in the fringe-to-typical range — with 2,225 minutes across 27 matches this season providing a solid evidence base. The most notable characteristic here is consistency in mediocrity: no sub-score data reveals a standout dimension, and the overall profile signals a player who meets the minimum bar for a starting role without exceeding it. At this score level, the player ranks below the baseline expectation for a center-back in a top-five European league.
The FQ score of 47.99 is driven primarily by below-baseline composite output across the center-back role, with the performance agent anchoring at 42 — the lowest of the three specialist scores. The absence of granular defensive sub-scores (all null) means the composite is built on limited signal, but data completeness at 90.9% and a confidence rating of 0.77 indicate this score reflects genuine performance gaps rather than a data artifact.
Form is stable: the form score of 46.38 sits just 1.6 points below the FQ score of 47.99, well within the ±5 threshold. There is no meaningful upward or downward trend — this player is performing at a consistent, flat level with no signs of either recovery or accelerating decline.
The closest comparable at FQ 48.49, suggesting a similarly fringe-starter profile at center-back; Cabrera Sasía edges this player by 0.5 FQ points, indicating marginally more consistent defensive output.
Top 50 players by TactiQ Score — filter by position, form, and confidence.
TactiQ Score, form, confidence, and season stats compared side by side — instantly.
Every TactiQ Score is deterministic and traceable. Read the full methodology behind the numbers.
At FQ 47.13, Torres sits just below this player on the scale, reflecting a comparable level of below-baseline center-back contribution; the key difference is Torres's slightly lower score suggests even thinner output in role-specific metrics.
FQ 46.79 places Smith at the bottom of this comparable cluster; like this player, Smith operates in the fringe range, though the 1.2-point gap suggests this player has a marginal edge in overall composite performance.
The defense sub-score is null, preventing direct measurement, but the performance agent explicitly flags insufficient volume or efficiency in core defensive contributions as the primary concern for a center-back. With 1.7 tackles per 90, the raw tackle rate is present but no duel success rate, interception, or clearance data is available to confirm effectiveness.
0.65 key passes per 90 and 0.08 assists per 90 are modest figures for a center-back — not a role expectation, but they do not compensate for the defensive gaps either. Creation sub-score is null, so this cannot be confirmed as a genuine strength.
A 0–100 measure of overall quality. Combines statistical output with league difficulty, multi-season weighting, and a consistency factor. Target range for strong players: 70–85.
Weighted toward recent matches. Can diverge from the TactiQ Score when current form is meaningfully stronger or weaker than the multi-season average.
How much evidence supports this score. Lower confidence means thinner data — fewer seasons, fewer appearances, or gaps in coverage. A provisional score is real signal with appropriate caveats.
TactiQ Scores are deterministic — given the same evidence, they produce the same output. The evidence packet system, confidence labels, and publication gate are all explained in full.
Read the full methodology →