TactiQ
Sign InGet Started
TactiQ
Football Intelligence
Founding Beta

TactiQ is built around Player & Club Data, Match Intelligence, Predictive Modeling, and Research & Visualization — understand the system, not the surface.

Core
Club football as the permanent base
Launch
World Cup as the launch amplifier
Transparency
Public roadmap and visible system progress
The standard
Methodology →

Every score is deterministic, evidence-gated, and confidence-labelled. Football intelligence should be explainable — not a black box with a number on the front. The methodology is part of the product, not a legal page.

Deterministic scoringMulti-agent consensus gatedPublication gate active
Core
PlayersClubsMatchesWorld Cup 2026Roadmap
Product
CompareRankingsForecastMethodologyMembership
Legal
PrivacyTerms© 2026 TactiQ. All rights reserved.
Player Profile

Loading player profile...

Pulling current player details into TactiQ.

Player Profile

Mark McKenzie

TactiQ Score, per-90 performance stats, and multi-season form — with direct routes into compare and rankings.

Current Team
Toulouse
Position
Centre Back
Date of Birth
Feb 25, 1999 (27)
Jersey Number
#3
League
Ligue 1
Back to PlayersCompare PlayerOpen RankingsView Methodology
Mark McKenzie
Mark McKenzie
Current profile snapshot
Current Team
Toulouse
Position
Centre Back
Date of Birth
Feb 25, 1999 (27)
Jersey Number
#3
TactiQ Score
67.6
80% confidence
TactiQ Score v2
67.6
Form Score
63.3
Confidence
80%
Role
center_back
League
Ligue 1
Per 90 minutes
Goals
—
Assists
0.08
Key Pass
0.66
Tackles
1.67
Rating
6.71
Multi-season trend
AI Analysis
Generated May 6, 2026

A Ligue 1 center-back sitting at 47.99 on the FQ scale — squarely in the fringe-to-typical range — with 2,225 minutes across 27 matches this season providing a solid evidence base. The most notable characteristic here is consistency in mediocrity: no sub-score data reveals a standout dimension, and the overall profile signals a player who meets the minimum bar for a starting role without exceeding it. At this score level, the player ranks below the baseline expectation for a center-back in a top-five European league.

Why this score

The FQ score of 47.99 is driven primarily by below-baseline composite output across the center-back role, with the performance agent anchoring at 42 — the lowest of the three specialist scores. The absence of granular defensive sub-scores (all null) means the composite is built on limited signal, but data completeness at 90.9% and a confidence rating of 0.77 indicate this score reflects genuine performance gaps rather than a data artifact.

Form Trajectory

Form is stable: the form score of 46.38 sits just 1.6 points below the FQ score of 47.99, well within the ±5 threshold. There is no meaningful upward or downward trend — this player is performing at a consistent, flat level with no signs of either recovery or accelerating decline.

Similar Profiles
Players with comparable scoring profiles in the same role
Leandro Daniel Cabrera Sasía

The closest comparable at FQ 48.49, suggesting a similarly fringe-starter profile at center-back; Cabrera Sasía edges this player by 0.5 FQ points, indicating marginally more consistent defensive output.

Compare →
Rankings
See where this player sits across all scored players.

Top 50 players by TactiQ Score — filter by position, form, and confidence.

Open Rankings →
Compare
Put this player next to another and find the real edges.

TactiQ Score, form, confidence, and season stats compared side by side — instantly.

Compare Player →
Methodology
Understand exactly how this score was built.

Every TactiQ Score is deterministic and traceable. Read the full methodology behind the numbers.

View Methodology →
Latest available season snapshot

Live statistics currently available for this profile

9 metrics surfaced
Appearances
29
Minutes
2405
Assists
2
Key passes
19
Rating
6.74
Tackles
44
Shots on target
1
Successful dribbles
6
Clean sheets
8
Current indicators
What the live season sample is surfacing right now
Previous
TQ 67.8Form 68.3
Current
TQ 62.9Form 63.3
Per 90 minutes
Goals
—
Assists
0.08
Key Passes
0.66
Tackles
1.67
Rating
6.71
Pau Francisco Torres

At FQ 47.13, Torres sits just below this player on the scale, reflecting a comparable level of below-baseline center-back contribution; the key difference is Torres's slightly lower score suggests even thinner output in role-specific metrics.

Compare →
Eric Anders Smith

FQ 46.79 places Smith at the bottom of this comparable cluster; like this player, Smith operates in the fringe range, though the 1.2-point gap suggests this player has a marginal edge in overall composite performance.

Compare →
Heavy minute load
2405 minutes suggest a significant current role in the squad rotation.
Creative involvement
Current snapshot shows meaningful chance supply and final-third contribution.
Defensive activity
44 tackles indicate active intervention volume in the current season sample.
Defensive outcomes
8 clean sheets are surfacing in the current live snapshot.
Strengths
Where this player is genuinely above baseline
No clearly elite traits identified in current data.
Watchpoints
Real gaps relative to this player's role
Defensive output

The defense sub-score is null, preventing direct measurement, but the performance agent explicitly flags insufficient volume or efficiency in core defensive contributions as the primary concern for a center-back. With 1.7 tackles per 90, the raw tackle rate is present but no duel success rate, interception, or clearance data is available to confirm effectiveness.

Creative contribution

0.65 key passes per 90 and 0.08 assists per 90 are modest figures for a center-back — not a role expectation, but they do not compensate for the defensive gaps either. Creation sub-score is null, so this cannot be confirmed as a genuine strength.

Reading the score

What each number means

TactiQ Score

A 0–100 measure of overall quality. Combines statistical output with league difficulty, multi-season weighting, and a consistency factor. Target range for strong players: 70–85.

Form Score

Weighted toward recent matches. Can diverge from the TactiQ Score when current form is meaningfully stronger or weaker than the multi-season average.

Confidence

How much evidence supports this score. Lower confidence means thinner data — fewer seasons, fewer appearances, or gaps in coverage. A provisional score is real signal with appropriate caveats.

Methodology

TactiQ Scores are deterministic — given the same evidence, they produce the same output. The evidence packet system, confidence labels, and publication gate are all explained in full.

Read the full methodology →