TactiQ
Sign InGet Started
TactiQ
Football Intelligence
Founding Beta

TactiQ is built around Player & Club Data, Match Intelligence, Predictive Modeling, and Research & Visualization — understand the system, not the surface.

Core
Club football as the permanent base
Launch
World Cup as the launch amplifier
Transparency
Public roadmap and visible system progress
The standard
Methodology →

Every score is deterministic, evidence-gated, and confidence-labelled. Football intelligence should be explainable — not a black box with a number on the front. The methodology is part of the product, not a legal page.

Deterministic scoringMulti-agent consensus gatedPublication gate active
Core
PlayersClubsMatchesWorld Cup 2026Roadmap
Product
CompareRankingsForecastMethodologyMembership
Legal
PrivacyTerms© 2026 TactiQ. All rights reserved.
Player Profile

Loading player profile...

Pulling current player details into TactiQ.

Player Profile

Dan Burn

TactiQ Score, per-90 performance stats, and multi-season form — with direct routes into compare and rankings.

Current Team
Newcastle United
Position
Centre Back
Date of Birth
May 9, 1992 (34)
Jersey Number
#33
League
Premier League
Back to PlayersCompare PlayerOpen RankingsView Methodology
Dan Burn
Dan Burn
Current profile snapshot
Current Team
Newcastle United
Position
Centre Back
Date of Birth
May 9, 1992 (34)
Jersey Number
#33
TactiQ Score
71.4
86% confidence
TactiQ Score v2
71.4
Form Score
65.5
Confidence
86%
Role
center_back
League
Premier League
Per 90 minutes
Goals
0.04
Assists
0.09
Key Pass
0.27
Tackles
1.61
Rating
6.70
Multi-season trend
AI Analysis
Generated May 6, 2026

A Premier League center-back sitting at 47.88 on the FQ scale — below the 50-point midpoint and in fringe territory for a top-flight starter. Across 25 matches (1,920 minutes), the per-90 output is thin: 1.59 tackles, 0.28 key passes, and a 6.67 average match rating. All role-critical sub-scores (defense, progression, physical duels) are null, meaning the full picture cannot be confirmed, but the aggregate signal is consistently below baseline.

Why this score

The FQ score of 47.88 is driven primarily by below-baseline aggregate output relative to center-back positional expectations, with no sub-score clearing the 70 threshold to offset it. The absence of populated defensive sub-scores — the core dimension for this role — means there is no measurable compensating strength to pull the score upward.

Form Trajectory

Form score of 43.82 sits 4.06 points below the FQ score of 47.88 — within the ±5 stable band but trending toward soft decline territory. The risk agent flags a declining trajectory, and the absolute form score of 43.82 confirms no recent upturn.

Similar Profiles
Players with comparable scoring profiles in the same role
Leandro Daniel Cabrera Sasía

Closest FQ match at 48.49, suggesting a similar overall output level for a center-back; Cabrera Sasía's score edges marginally higher, indicating slightly more consistent aggregate contribution.

Compare →
Rankings
See where this player sits across all scored players.

Top 50 players by TactiQ Score — filter by position, form, and confidence.

Open Rankings →
Compare
Put this player next to another and find the real edges.

TactiQ Score, form, confidence, and season stats compared side by side — instantly.

Compare Player →
Methodology
Understand exactly how this score was built.

Every TactiQ Score is deterministic and traceable. Read the full methodology behind the numbers.

View Methodology →
Latest available season snapshot

Live statistics currently available for this profile

10 metrics surfaced
Appearances
27
Minutes
2100
Goals
1
Assists
2
Key passes
6
Rating
6.69
Tackles
38
Shots on target
3
Successful dribbles
2
Clean sheets
6
2 Seasons Ago
TQ 73.1Form 73.7
Previous
TQ 72.2Form 72.6
Current
TQ 65.0Form 65.5
Per 90 minutes
Goals
0.04
Assists
0.09
Key Passes
0.27
Tackles
1.61
Rating
6.70
Pau Francisco Torres

Nearly identical FQ score at 47.13 places Torres in the same below-50 fringe band; Torres is typically associated with stronger progressive passing, which may represent a point of differentiation if sub-scores were available.

Compare →
Eric Anders Smith

FQ of 46.79 is the lowest of the three comparables, sitting just below this player's score; Smith represents the floor of this peer group, suggesting the player is marginally ahead in aggregate output.

Compare →
Current indicators
What the live season sample is surfacing right now
Heavy minute load
2100 minutes suggest a significant current role in the squad rotation.
Defensive activity
38 tackles indicate active intervention volume in the current season sample.
Strengths
Where this player is genuinely above baseline
No clearly elite traits identified in current data.
Watchpoints
Real gaps relative to this player's role
Defensive output

1.59 tackles per 90 is the only available defensive volume indicator, and with the defense sub-score null, duel success rate, interceptions, and aerial dominance cannot be assessed — the most critical gap for a center-back evaluation.

Progression and build-up

Progression sub-score is null and key passes sit at just 0.28 per 90, offering no evidence of meaningful contribution to build-up play — an area where modern center-backs are increasingly expected to contribute.

Overall rating consistency

A 6.67 average match rating across 25 Premier League appearances reflects below-average consistency for a top-flight center-back, with no recent form uplift to suggest improvement.

Reading the score

What each number means

TactiQ Score

A 0–100 measure of overall quality. Combines statistical output with league difficulty, multi-season weighting, and a consistency factor. Target range for strong players: 70–85.

Form Score

Weighted toward recent matches. Can diverge from the TactiQ Score when current form is meaningfully stronger or weaker than the multi-season average.

Confidence

How much evidence supports this score. Lower confidence means thinner data — fewer seasons, fewer appearances, or gaps in coverage. A provisional score is real signal with appropriate caveats.

Methodology

TactiQ Scores are deterministic — given the same evidence, they produce the same output. The evidence packet system, confidence labels, and publication gate are all explained in full.

Read the full methodology →