Pulling current player details into TactiQ.
TactiQ Score, per-90 performance stats, and multi-season form — with direct routes into compare and rankings.

A Premier League center-back sitting at 47.88 on the FQ scale — below the 50-point midpoint and in fringe territory for a top-flight starter. Across 25 matches (1,920 minutes), the per-90 output is thin: 1.59 tackles, 0.28 key passes, and a 6.67 average match rating. All role-critical sub-scores (defense, progression, physical duels) are null, meaning the full picture cannot be confirmed, but the aggregate signal is consistently below baseline.
The FQ score of 47.88 is driven primarily by below-baseline aggregate output relative to center-back positional expectations, with no sub-score clearing the 70 threshold to offset it. The absence of populated defensive sub-scores — the core dimension for this role — means there is no measurable compensating strength to pull the score upward.
Form score of 43.82 sits 4.06 points below the FQ score of 47.88 — within the ±5 stable band but trending toward soft decline territory. The risk agent flags a declining trajectory, and the absolute form score of 43.82 confirms no recent upturn.
Closest FQ match at 48.49, suggesting a similar overall output level for a center-back; Cabrera Sasía's score edges marginally higher, indicating slightly more consistent aggregate contribution.
Top 50 players by TactiQ Score — filter by position, form, and confidence.
TactiQ Score, form, confidence, and season stats compared side by side — instantly.
Every TactiQ Score is deterministic and traceable. Read the full methodology behind the numbers.
Nearly identical FQ score at 47.13 places Torres in the same below-50 fringe band; Torres is typically associated with stronger progressive passing, which may represent a point of differentiation if sub-scores were available.
FQ of 46.79 is the lowest of the three comparables, sitting just below this player's score; Smith represents the floor of this peer group, suggesting the player is marginally ahead in aggregate output.
1.59 tackles per 90 is the only available defensive volume indicator, and with the defense sub-score null, duel success rate, interceptions, and aerial dominance cannot be assessed — the most critical gap for a center-back evaluation.
Progression sub-score is null and key passes sit at just 0.28 per 90, offering no evidence of meaningful contribution to build-up play — an area where modern center-backs are increasingly expected to contribute.
A 6.67 average match rating across 25 Premier League appearances reflects below-average consistency for a top-flight center-back, with no recent form uplift to suggest improvement.
A 0–100 measure of overall quality. Combines statistical output with league difficulty, multi-season weighting, and a consistency factor. Target range for strong players: 70–85.
Weighted toward recent matches. Can diverge from the TactiQ Score when current form is meaningfully stronger or weaker than the multi-season average.
How much evidence supports this score. Lower confidence means thinner data — fewer seasons, fewer appearances, or gaps in coverage. A provisional score is real signal with appropriate caveats.
TactiQ Scores are deterministic — given the same evidence, they produce the same output. The evidence packet system, confidence labels, and publication gate are all explained in full.
Read the full methodology →