TactiQ
Sign InGet Started
TactiQ
Football Intelligence
Founding Beta

TactiQ is built around Player & Club Data, Match Intelligence, Predictive Modeling, and Research & Visualization — understand the system, not the surface.

Core
Club football as the permanent base
Launch
World Cup as the launch amplifier
Transparency
Public roadmap and visible system progress
The standard
Methodology →

Every score is deterministic, evidence-gated, and confidence-labelled. Football intelligence should be explainable — not a black box with a number on the front. The methodology is part of the product, not a legal page.

Deterministic scoringMulti-agent consensus gatedPublication gate active
Core
PlayersClubsMatchesWorld Cup 2026Roadmap
Product
CompareRankingsForecastMethodologyMembership
Legal
PrivacyTerms© 2026 TactiQ. All rights reserved.
Player Profile

Loading player profile...

Pulling current player details into TactiQ.

Player Profile

Viktor Tsygankov

TactiQ Score, per-90 performance stats, and multi-season form — with direct routes into compare and rankings.

Current Team
Girona
Position
Right Wing
Also: Winger
Date of Birth
Nov 15, 1997 (28)
Jersey Number
#15
League
La Liga
Back to PlayersCompare PlayerOpen RankingsView Methodology
Viktor Tsygankov
Viktor Tsygankov
Current profile snapshot
Current Team
Girona
Position
Right Wing
Also: Winger
Date of Birth
Nov 15, 1997 (28)
Jersey Number
#15
TactiQ Score
67.3
91% confidence
TactiQ Score v2
67.3
Form Score
63.5
Confidence
91%
Role
winger
League
La Liga
Per 90 minutes
Goals
0.24
Assists
0.16
Key Pass
1.69
Tackles
1.10
Rating
7.12
Multi-season trend
AI Analysis
Generated Apr 30, 2026

A La Liga winger sitting at 56.89 on the FQ scale — adequate starter territory with clear gaps versus the top end of the position. Across 27 matches and 2,202 minutes this season, he contributes 0.25 goals and 0.16 assists per 90, with 1.72 key passes per 90 providing the most visible output signal. No sub-score breakdowns are available, which limits deeper profiling, but the overall picture is a functional winger who meets baseline expectations without standing out in any specific dimension.

Why this score

The 56.89 FQ score reflects mid-range adequacy across the board, with no sub-score dimension available to identify a standout driver. The score confidence of 0.87 over 27 matches confirms this is a reliable read, not a thin-sample artifact — this is genuinely where this player sits.

Form Trajectory

Form score of 57.03 sits just +0.14 above the FQ score of 56.89 — a delta well within the ±5 stable band. There is no meaningful upward or downward momentum; output has been consistent and flat across the current sample.

Similar Profiles
Players with comparable scoring profiles in the same role
Alex Iwobi

Iwobi's FQ score of 57.64 places him in the same adequate-starter band, reflecting similar functional winger output; the marginal 0.75-point gap suggests Iwobi edges slightly on overall scoring but the profiles are closely matched.

Compare →
Harvey Lewis Barnes
Rankings
See where this player sits across all scored players.

Top 50 players by TactiQ Score — filter by position, form, and confidence.

Open Rankings →
Compare
Put this player next to another and find the real edges.

TactiQ Score, form, confidence, and season stats compared side by side — instantly.

Compare Player →
Methodology
Understand exactly how this score was built.

Every TactiQ Score is deterministic and traceable. Read the full methodology behind the numbers.

View Methodology →
Latest available season snapshot

Live statistics currently available for this profile

10 metrics surfaced
Appearances
29
Minutes
2382
Goals
6
Assists
5
Key passes
46
Rating
7.12
Tackles
29
Shots on target
17
Successful dribbles
23
Clean sheets
5
2 Seasons Ago
TQ 69.1Form 69.1
Previous
TQ 63.0Form 62.7
Current
TQ 63.6Form 63.5
Per 90 minutes
Goals
0.24
Assists
0.16
Key Passes
1.69
Tackles
1.10
Rating
7.12

Barnes scores 55.70, fractionally below this player, indicating a comparable level of contribution with neither profile breaking into the above-average tier.

Compare →
Jack Grealish

Grealish at 58.16 is the ceiling of this peer group, sitting just 1.27 points higher — all three players cluster tightly in the 55–59 range, underlining a shared profile of consistent but unspectacular winger output.

Compare →
Current indicators
What the live season sample is surfacing right now
Heavy minute load
2382 minutes suggest a significant current role in the squad rotation.
Direct output
11 combined goals and assists are showing in live coverage.
Creative involvement
Current snapshot shows meaningful chance supply and final-third contribution.
Defensive activity
29 tackles indicate active intervention volume in the current season sample.
Strengths
Where this player is genuinely above baseline
No clearly elite traits identified in current data.
Watchpoints
Real gaps relative to this player's role
Goal contribution rate

0.25 goals and 0.16 assists per 90 combine for 0.41 direct goal contributions per 90 — functional but below what separates impactful La Liga wingers from adequate ones.

Sub-score visibility

All dimensional sub-scores (finishing, creation, progression, defense) are null, meaning no single area can be confirmed as a strength. This absence of a standout dimension is itself a signal of positional adequacy rather than specialisation.

Reading the score

What each number means

TactiQ Score

A 0–100 measure of overall quality. Combines statistical output with league difficulty, multi-season weighting, and a consistency factor. Target range for strong players: 70–85.

Form Score

Weighted toward recent matches. Can diverge from the TactiQ Score when current form is meaningfully stronger or weaker than the multi-season average.

Confidence

How much evidence supports this score. Lower confidence means thinner data — fewer seasons, fewer appearances, or gaps in coverage. A provisional score is real signal with appropriate caveats.

Methodology

TactiQ Scores are deterministic — given the same evidence, they produce the same output. The evidence packet system, confidence labels, and publication gate are all explained in full.

Read the full methodology →