Pulling current player details into TactiQ.
TactiQ Score, per-90 performance stats, and multi-season form — with direct routes into compare and rankings.

A Premier League winger sitting at 77.74 TQ Score — above average for a starter, but with no elite-level dimension across any sub-score. The most distinctive feature of this profile is the contrast between a respectable overall score and a finishing sub-score of 44.27, which sits clearly below baseline for an attacking role. At 2.46 key passes per 90 and 0.18 assists per 90, the contribution is real but not dominant.
The TQ Score of 77.74 is held up by balanced mid-range contributions across creation (54.9), progression (53.13), and defense (51), but is dragged down most visibly by a finishing sub-score of 44.27 — the single largest gap below baseline in the profile. Without a dimension above 70, there is no elite anchor pulling the score higher.
Form score of 73.12 sits 4.62 points below the TQ Score of 77.74 — within the ±5 stable band, but nudging toward a soft decline. The trend warrants monitoring rather than alarm, particularly given data freshness is flagged as stale at 34 days old.
Nearly identical TQ Score (77.51 vs 77.74) reflects a similar tier of overall winger output; the key difference is how each player distributes their contribution across sub-dimensions.
Top 50 players by TactiQ Score — filter by position, form, and confidence.
TactiQ Score, form, confidence, and season stats compared side by side — instantly.
Every TactiQ Score is deterministic and traceable. Read the full methodology behind the numbers.
A close TQ Score match at 79.27 places him in the same performance band, though his profile likely carries a higher finishing or progression ceiling given the marginal score advantage.
The highest-scoring comparable at 80.24, representing the next tier this player would need to reach; the 2.5-point gap reflects the difference a single elite-level sub-score dimension would make.
A finishing sub-score of 44.27 is below baseline for a winger role and is the clearest drag on this player's ceiling. At 0.27 goals per 90, output is modest relative to the chances the role generates, suggesting conversion inefficiency rather than a lack of opportunity.
A possession control sub-score of 30.29 is the lowest dimension in the profile and represents a meaningful gap for a winger expected to retain the ball under pressure and sustain attacks. This limits effectiveness in tight spaces and against high-pressing opponents.
A creation sub-score of 54.9 sits in the middle range — functional but not a differentiator. At 2.46 key passes per 90, the volume is present, but the quality ceiling implied by this score means the player is not consistently unlocking defences at a high level.
A 0–100 measure of overall quality. Combines statistical output with league difficulty, multi-season weighting, and a consistency factor. Target range for strong players: 70–85.
Weighted toward recent matches. Can diverge from the TactiQ Score when current form is meaningfully stronger or weaker than the multi-season average.
How much evidence supports this score. Lower confidence means thinner data — fewer seasons, fewer appearances, or gaps in coverage. A provisional score is real signal with appropriate caveats.
TactiQ Scores are deterministic — given the same evidence, they produce the same output. The evidence packet system, confidence labels, and publication gate are all explained in full.
Read the full methodology →