Pulling current player details into TactiQ.
TactiQ Score, per-90 performance stats, and multi-season form — with direct routes into compare and rankings.

A fringe-level defensive midfielder in the Premier League with an FQ Score of 48.11 — sitting in the typical-to-below-average band on the 0-100 scale. The most distinctive feature of this evaluation is not a weakness in any one dimension but the complete absence of sub-score data across all role-critical areas, making it impossible to identify a clear strength or pinpoint a specific failing. With 1,836 minutes across 27 matches, this is not a thin-sample problem — the score of 48.11 reflects sustained, consistent output at a below-baseline level.
The FQ Score of 48.11 is driven primarily by below-baseline overall production in a clearly defined defensive midfield role, with a per-90 rating of 6.67 and no sub-score above the threshold needed to identify a standout dimension. All role-critical sub-scores — defense, progression, creation, and finishing — are null, meaning no single area pulls the score up.
Form is entirely stable: the form score of 48.04 sits just -0.07 below the FQ Score of 48.11, a delta well within the ±5 stable band. There is no sign of a recent upturn or decline — this is a flat, consistent output level sustained across the season.
Nearly identical FQ Score (47.94 vs 48.11) places both players in the same typical-performer band; Bentancur Colmán's profile may offer more dimensional clarity given his longer top-flight data history.
Top 50 players by TactiQ Score — filter by position, form, and confidence.
TactiQ Score, form, confidence, and season stats compared side by side — instantly.
Every TactiQ Score is deterministic and traceable. Read the full methodology behind the numbers.
The closest FQ match at 48.59, suggesting similar overall output levels in a defensive midfield role; Colombatto operates in a different league context, which may account for subtle differences in how that score is composed.
FQ Score of 47.62 puts Souček in the same band, but Souček's profile is typically characterised by aerial and physical duel contributions — a dimensional contrast that highlights what remains unknown about this player's own sub-score profile.
For a defensive midfielder, tackles (3.92 per 90) is the one available volume metric, but without a defense sub-score to contextualise efficiency or success rate, it is unclear whether this volume translates into meaningful defensive contribution. The null defense sub-score is a meaningful gap for this role.
Key passes sit at just 0.49 per 90 and assists at 0.10 per 90 — both below what would be expected of a Premier League defensive midfielder contributing meaningfully in transition or build-up. Progression and creation sub-scores are null, reinforcing the absence of a clear creative outlet.
Despite a solid confidence score of 0.82 and 91% data completeness, the specialist panel reached only contested agreement (consensus confidence 0.52), with individual agent scores ranging from 46 to 68. The null sub-score profile is the core source of that disagreement and limits how precisely this player's ceiling or floor can be assessed.
A 0–100 measure of overall quality. Combines statistical output with league difficulty, multi-season weighting, and a consistency factor. Target range for strong players: 70–85.
Weighted toward recent matches. Can diverge from the TactiQ Score when current form is meaningfully stronger or weaker than the multi-season average.
How much evidence supports this score. Lower confidence means thinner data — fewer seasons, fewer appearances, or gaps in coverage. A provisional score is real signal with appropriate caveats.
TactiQ Scores are deterministic — given the same evidence, they produce the same output. The evidence packet system, confidence labels, and publication gate are all explained in full.
Read the full methodology →