TactiQ
Sign InGet Started
TactiQ
Football Intelligence
Founding Beta

TactiQ is built around Player & Club Data, Match Intelligence, Predictive Modeling, and Research & Visualization — understand the system, not the surface.

Core
Club football as the permanent base
Launch
World Cup as the launch amplifier
Transparency
Public roadmap and visible system progress
The standard
Methodology →

Every score is deterministic, evidence-gated, and confidence-labelled. Football intelligence should be explainable — not a black box with a number on the front. The methodology is part of the product, not a legal page.

Deterministic scoringMulti-agent consensus gatedPublication gate active
Core
PlayersClubsMatchesWorld Cup 2026Roadmap
Product
CompareRankingsForecastMethodologyMembership
Legal
PrivacyTerms© 2026 TactiQ. All rights reserved.
Player Profile

Loading player profile...

Pulling current player details into TactiQ.

Player Profile

Vanja Milinković-Savić 

TactiQ Score, per-90 performance stats, and multi-season form — with direct routes into compare and rankings.

Current Team
Napoli
Position
Goalkeeper
Date of Birth
Feb 20, 1997 (29)
Jersey Number
#32
League
Serie A
Back to PlayersCompare PlayerOpen RankingsView Methodology
Vanja Milinković-Savić 
Vanja Milinković-Savić 
Current profile snapshot
Current Team
Napoli
Position
Goalkeeper
Date of Birth
Feb 20, 1997 (29)
Jersey Number
#32
TactiQ Score
79.0
84% confidence
TactiQ Score v2
79.0
Form Score
70.9
Confidence
84%
Role
goalkeeper
League
Serie A
Per 90 minutes
Goals
—
Assists
0.04
Key Pass
0.12
Tackles
—
Rating
6.86
Multi-season trend
AI Analysis
Generated May 9, 2026

A Serie A goalkeeper sitting at 69.22 on the TQ scale — adequate starter territory, consistent enough to hold a starting berth but without the sub-score profile to distinguish himself at the top end of the league. With 2,250 minutes across 25 matches this season, the sample is reliable (confidence: 0.81), and the score reflects a genuine mid-tier baseline rather than a small-sample artifact. No granular goalkeeper sub-scores (save rate, xG prevented, clean sheet rate) are available, which caps the depth of this read.

Why this score

The TQ Score of 69.22 is driven by composite goalkeeper performance — shot-stopping, positioning, and distribution — assessed at a consistent but unspectacular level. The absence of role-specific sub-scores (all null) means no single dimension can be isolated as the primary driver; the score reflects a stable aggregate rather than any standout quality.

Form Trajectory

Form score of 61.84 is 7.4 points below the TQ Score of 69.22, placing this firmly in soft-decline territory. The trend is credible given the strong data confidence (0.81) and full-season sample — this is not a blip driven by thin evidence.

Similar Profiles
Players with comparable scoring profiles in the same role
Damián Emiliano Martínez

Nearly identical TQ scores (69.26 vs 69.22) place them at the same tier of consistent mid-to-upper starter quality; Martínez carries a higher-profile reputation that may not be fully reflected at this scoring level.

Compare →
Rankings
See where this player sits across all scored players.

Top 50 players by TactiQ Score — filter by position, form, and confidence.

Open Rankings →
Compare
Put this player next to another and find the real edges.

TactiQ Score, form, confidence, and season stats compared side by side — instantly.

Compare Player →
Methodology
Understand exactly how this score was built.

Every TactiQ Score is deterministic and traceable. Read the full methodology behind the numbers.

View Methodology →
Latest available season snapshot

Live statistics currently available for this profile

6 metrics surfaced
Appearances
27
Minutes
2430
Assists
1
Key passes
3
Rating
6.83
Clean sheets
11
Current indicators
What the live season sample is surfacing right now
Heavy minute load
2430 minutes suggest a significant current role in the squad rotation.
Defensive outcomes
11 clean sheets are surfacing in the current live snapshot.
Save load
2 Seasons Ago
TQ 80.7Form 80.6
Previous
TQ 79.5Form 79.6
Current
TQ 71.0Form 70.9
Per 90 minutes
Goals
—
Assists
0.04
Key Passes
0.12
Tackles
—
Rating
6.86
David de Gea Quintana

De Gea's 70.3 TQ Score sits just above at the same tier, making him the ceiling benchmark in this comparable set; his distribution profile historically differs from a more shot-stopping-oriented game.

Compare →
Dominik Greif

Greif's 68.46 TQ Score is the closest match below, reflecting a similar adequate-starter profile; both sit in the 60-69 band where clear gaps exist but starting-quality output is maintained.

Compare →
56 saves suggest a significant shot-stopping workload in current coverage.
Strengths
Where this player is genuinely above baseline
No clearly elite traits identified in current data.
Watchpoints
Real gaps relative to this player's role
Recent form

Form score of 61.84 sits 7.4 points below the season TQ Score of 69.22 — a soft-to-meaningful decline. Over a 25-match, 2,250-minute sample this gap is not noise; it points to a genuine dip in recent output relative to his established baseline.

Goalkeeper-specific metrics

No sub-scores for saves per 90, save percentage, or goals prevented above expected are available. For a goalkeeper, these are the primary value dimensions, and their absence means the 69.22 score cannot be stress-tested against shot volume or xG faced — a meaningful analytical gap for this role.

Reading the score

What each number means

TactiQ Score

A 0–100 measure of overall quality. Combines statistical output with league difficulty, multi-season weighting, and a consistency factor. Target range for strong players: 70–85.

Form Score

Weighted toward recent matches. Can diverge from the TactiQ Score when current form is meaningfully stronger or weaker than the multi-season average.

Confidence

How much evidence supports this score. Lower confidence means thinner data — fewer seasons, fewer appearances, or gaps in coverage. A provisional score is real signal with appropriate caveats.

Methodology

TactiQ Scores are deterministic — given the same evidence, they produce the same output. The evidence packet system, confidence labels, and publication gate are all explained in full.

Read the full methodology →