TactiQ
Sign InGet Started
TactiQ
Football Intelligence
Founding Beta

TactiQ is built around Player & Club Data, Match Intelligence, Predictive Modeling, and Research & Visualization — understand the system, not the surface.

Core
Club football as the permanent base
Launch
World Cup as the launch amplifier
Transparency
Public roadmap and visible system progress
The standard
Methodology →

Every score is deterministic, evidence-gated, and confidence-labelled. Football intelligence should be explainable — not a black box with a number on the front. The methodology is part of the product, not a legal page.

Deterministic scoringMulti-agent consensus gatedPublication gate active
Core
PlayersClubsMatchesWorld Cup 2026Roadmap
Product
CompareRankingsForecastMethodologyMembership
Legal
PrivacyTerms© 2026 TactiQ. All rights reserved.
Player Profile

Loading player profile...

Pulling current player details into TactiQ.

Player Profile

Emerson

TactiQ Score, per-90 performance stats, and multi-season form — with direct routes into compare and rankings.

Current Team
Olympique Marseille
Position
Left Back
Also: Full Back / Wing Back
Date of Birth
Aug 3, 1994 (31)
Jersey Number
#33
League
Ligue 1
Back to PlayersCompare PlayerOpen RankingsView Methodology
Emerson
Emerson
Current profile snapshot
Current Team
Olympique Marseille
Position
Left Back
Also: Full Back / Wing Back
Date of Birth
Aug 3, 1994 (31)
Jersey Number
#33
TactiQ Score
69.1
85% confidence
TactiQ Score v2
69.1
Form Score
66.7
Confidence
85%
Role
fullback_wingback
League
Ligue 1
Per 90 minutes
Goals
—
Assists
0.14
Key Pass
1.91
Tackles
1.77
Rating
7.02
Multi-season trend
AI Analysis
Generated May 6, 2026

A Ligue 1 fullback/wingback sitting at an FQ Score of 50.68 — squarely in the typical performer band — with no sub-score breakdowns available to identify a clear strength or weakness profile. Across 25 matches and 1,844 minutes this season, the most visible output is 1.85 key passes and 1.76 tackles per 90, suggesting a player who contributes modestly in both phases without standing out in either. At this point on the scale, this is a rotation-level or fringe starter rather than a reliable first-choice option.

Why this score

With all role-specific sub-scores (finishing, creation, progression, defense) returning null, the FQ Score of 50.68 is driven entirely by aggregate output metrics rather than dimensional excellence. The absence of any sub-score above threshold means there is no single area pulling the rating upward — the score reflects a flat, undifferentiated contribution profile.

Form Trajectory

Form score of 51.94 sits just 1.26 points above the FQ Score of 50.68 — well within the ±5 stable band. There is no meaningful upward or downward momentum; recent form is essentially flat relative to the season baseline.

Similar Profiles
Players with comparable scoring profiles in the same role
Gabriel Gudmundsson

Nearly identical FQ Score (50.5 vs 50.68), reflecting a similar tier of typical fullback output; Gudmundsson's profile may offer more positional clarity given available sub-score data.

Compare →
Rankings
See where this player sits across all scored players.

Top 50 players by TactiQ Score — filter by position, form, and confidence.

Open Rankings →
Compare
Put this player next to another and find the real edges.

TactiQ Score, form, confidence, and season stats compared side by side — instantly.

Compare Player →
Methodology
Understand exactly how this score was built.

Every TactiQ Score is deterministic and traceable. Read the full methodology behind the numbers.

View Methodology →
Latest available season snapshot

Live statistics currently available for this profile

9 metrics surfaced
Appearances
27
Minutes
2024
Assists
3
Key passes
41
Rating
7.04
Tackles
44
Shots on target
2
Successful dribbles
8
Clean sheets
9
Current indicators
What the live season sample is surfacing right now
2 Seasons Ago
TQ 66.7Form 66.1
Previous
TQ 64.1Form 63.8
Current
TQ 66.9Form 66.7
Per 90 minutes
Goals
—
Assists
0.14
Key Passes
1.91
Tackles
1.77
Rating
7.02
Ainsley Maitland-Niles

Closest FQ Score among comparables at 51.95, placing both players in the same typical-performer band; Maitland-Niles carries more positional versatility which may account for the marginal gap.

Compare →
Johan Andrés Mojica Palacio

Slightly lower FQ Score at 48.63, making him the floor of this comparable set; both players share a flat output profile at the fullback/wingback position, though Mojica Palacio's score edges below the 50 threshold.

Compare →
Heavy minute load
2024 minutes suggest a significant current role in the squad rotation.
Creative involvement
Current snapshot shows meaningful chance supply and final-third contribution.
Defensive activity
44 tackles indicate active intervention volume in the current season sample.
Defensive outcomes
9 clean sheets are surfacing in the current live snapshot.
Strengths
Where this player is genuinely above baseline
No clearly elite traits identified in current data.
Watchpoints
Real gaps relative to this player's role
Dimensional profile

All four role-relevant sub-scores — creation, progression, defense, and finishing — are null, meaning no measurable strength has been captured across the dimensions most critical for a fullback/wingback. This is a meaningful gap: for this position, defensive output and progressive ball-carrying are core expectations, and neither registers a scoreable signal.

Reading the score

What each number means

TactiQ Score

A 0–100 measure of overall quality. Combines statistical output with league difficulty, multi-season weighting, and a consistency factor. Target range for strong players: 70–85.

Form Score

Weighted toward recent matches. Can diverge from the TactiQ Score when current form is meaningfully stronger or weaker than the multi-season average.

Confidence

How much evidence supports this score. Lower confidence means thinner data — fewer seasons, fewer appearances, or gaps in coverage. A provisional score is real signal with appropriate caveats.

Methodology

TactiQ Scores are deterministic — given the same evidence, they produce the same output. The evidence packet system, confidence labels, and publication gate are all explained in full.

Read the full methodology →