TactiQ
Sign InGet Started
TactiQ
Football Intelligence
Founding Beta

TactiQ is built around Player & Club Data, Match Intelligence, Predictive Modeling, and Research & Visualization — understand the system, not the surface.

Core
Club football as the permanent base
Launch
World Cup as the launch amplifier
Transparency
Public roadmap and visible system progress
The standard
Methodology →

Every score is deterministic, evidence-gated, and confidence-labelled. Football intelligence should be explainable — not a black box with a number on the front. The methodology is part of the product, not a legal page.

Deterministic scoringMulti-agent consensus gatedPublication gate active
Core
PlayersClubsMatchesWorld Cup 2026Roadmap
Product
CompareRankingsForecastMethodologyMembership
Legal
PrivacyTerms© 2026 TactiQ. All rights reserved.
Player Profile

Loading player profile...

Pulling current player details into TactiQ.

Player Profile

Mattia Zaccagni 

TactiQ Score, per-90 performance stats, and multi-season form — with direct routes into compare and rankings.

Current Team
Lazio
Position
Left Wing
Also: Winger
Date of Birth
Jun 16, 1995 (30)
Jersey Number
#10
League
Serie A
Back to PlayersCompare PlayerOpen RankingsView Methodology
Mattia Zaccagni 
Mattia Zaccagni 
Current profile snapshot
Current Team
Lazio
Position
Left Wing
Also: Winger
Date of Birth
Jun 16, 1995 (30)
Jersey Number
#10
TactiQ Score
66.6
88% confidence
TactiQ Score v2
66.6
Form Score
61.4
Confidence
88%
Role
winger
League
Serie A
Per 90 minutes
Goals
0.13
Assists
—
Key Pass
1.49
Tackles
1.58
Rating
7.01
Multi-season trend
AI Analysis
Generated May 6, 2026

A mid-tier Serie A winger sitting at 54.74 on the FQ scale — adequate by positional baseline but without a standout dimension to separate them from typical starters. Across 25 matches and 2,054 minutes this season, the most visible output is 1.36 key passes per 90 and 1.62 tackles per 90, with goals at a modest 0.13 per 90. No sub-score clears the 70 threshold, and current form is tracking below the season baseline.

Why this score

The FQ score of 54.74 reflects a player meeting — but not exceeding — winger baseline expectations, with no granular sub-scores (finishing, creation, progression all null) available to identify a production spike in any specific dimension. The 0.13 goals per 90 and absence of assist data leave the attacking contribution case largely unbuilt.

Form Trajectory

Form is in soft decline, with the form score of 47.94 running 6.8 points below the FQ score of 54.74 — a gap that crosses the meaningful threshold. Given a score confidence of 0.84 and 91% data completeness, this is a reliable signal rather than noise from a thin sample.

Similar Profiles
Players with comparable scoring profiles in the same role
Gonçalo Manuel Ganchinho Guedes

Both sit within a narrow FQ band (55.24 vs 54.74), reflecting similar mid-tier winger profiles in competitive European leagues; Guedes carries a marginally higher baseline score, suggesting slightly more consistent production.

Compare →
Rankings
See where this player sits across all scored players.

Top 50 players by TactiQ Score — filter by position, form, and confidence.

Open Rankings →
Compare
Put this player next to another and find the real edges.

TactiQ Score, form, confidence, and season stats compared side by side — instantly.

Compare Player →
Methodology
Understand exactly how this score was built.

Every TactiQ Score is deterministic and traceable. Read the full methodology behind the numbers.

View Methodology →
Latest available season snapshot

Live statistics currently available for this profile

9 metrics surfaced
Appearances
26
Minutes
2114
Goals
3
Key passes
35
Rating
7.01
Tackles
37
Shots on target
14
Successful dribbles
23
Clean sheets
12
Current indicators
What the live season sample is surfacing right now
2 Seasons Ago
TQ 64.8Form 64.5
Previous
TQ 69.8Form 69.5
Current
TQ 61.8Form 61.4
Per 90 minutes
Goals
0.13
Assists
—
Key Passes
1.49
Tackles
1.58
Rating
7.01
David Brooks

Brooks (54.09) is the closest FQ match, sharing the same adequate-starter ceiling with no elite sub-score dimension; the key difference is league context, with Brooks operating outside Serie A.

Compare →
Harvey Lewis Barnes

Barnes scores 55.70 — just above this player — and represents a comparable output profile for a wide attacker; Barnes edges ahead on overall FQ, suggesting a slightly more productive attacking contribution.

Compare →
Heavy minute load
2114 minutes suggest a significant current role in the squad rotation.
Creative involvement
Current snapshot shows meaningful chance supply and final-third contribution.
Defensive activity
37 tackles indicate active intervention volume in the current season sample.
Defensive outcomes
12 clean sheets are surfacing in the current live snapshot.
Strengths
Where this player is genuinely above baseline
No clearly elite traits identified in current data.
Watchpoints
Real gaps relative to this player's role
Attacking output

0.13 goals per 90 is low for a winger role, and with assists data unavailable, there is no compensating creation volume to offset the thin goal return. Key passes at 1.36 per 90 suggest moderate involvement but not a creative focal point.

Form consistency

Form score of 47.94 sits 6.8 points below the season FQ of 54.74, indicating a soft decline in recent matches. At 47.94, current output is below the adequate-starter band, not just below personal baseline.

Reading the score

What each number means

TactiQ Score

A 0–100 measure of overall quality. Combines statistical output with league difficulty, multi-season weighting, and a consistency factor. Target range for strong players: 70–85.

Form Score

Weighted toward recent matches. Can diverge from the TactiQ Score when current form is meaningfully stronger or weaker than the multi-season average.

Confidence

How much evidence supports this score. Lower confidence means thinner data — fewer seasons, fewer appearances, or gaps in coverage. A provisional score is real signal with appropriate caveats.

Methodology

TactiQ Scores are deterministic — given the same evidence, they produce the same output. The evidence packet system, confidence labels, and publication gate are all explained in full.

Read the full methodology →