TactiQ
Sign InGet Started
TactiQ
Football Intelligence
Founding Beta

TactiQ is built around Player & Club Data, Match Intelligence, Predictive Modeling, and Research & Visualization — understand the system, not the surface.

Core
Club football as the permanent base
Launch
World Cup as the launch amplifier
Transparency
Public roadmap and visible system progress
The standard
Methodology →

Every score is deterministic, evidence-gated, and confidence-labelled. Football intelligence should be explainable — not a black box with a number on the front. The methodology is part of the product, not a legal page.

Deterministic scoringMulti-agent consensus gatedPublication gate active
Core
PlayersClubsMatchesWorld Cup 2026Roadmap
Product
CompareRankingsForecastMethodologyMembership
Legal
PrivacyTerms© 2026 TactiQ. All rights reserved.
Player Profile

Loading player profile...

Pulling current player details into TactiQ.

Player Profile

Duván Zapata

TactiQ Score, per-90 performance stats, and multi-season form — with direct routes into compare and rankings.

Current Team
Torino
Position
Centre Forward
Also: Striker
Date of Birth
Apr 1, 1991 (35)
Jersey Number
#91
League
Serie A
Back to PlayersCompare PlayerOpen RankingsView Methodology
Duván Zapata
Duván Zapata
Current profile snapshot
Current Team
Torino
Position
Centre Forward
Also: Striker
Date of Birth
Apr 1, 1991 (35)
Jersey Number
#91
TactiQ Score
67.8
76% confidence
TactiQ Score v2
67.8
Form Score
61.6
Confidence
76%
Role
striker
League
Serie A
Per 90 minutes
Goals
0.27
Assists
0.18
Key Pass
1.00
Tackles
0.27
Rating
6.69
Multi-season trend
AI Analysis
Generated May 6, 2026

A mid-range Serie A striker sitting at 53.76 on the FQ scale — squarely in the typical performer band, meeting baseline expectations for the role without exceeding them. Across 25 appearances and 962 minutes this season, he averages 0.28 goals and 0.09 assists per 90, output that is functional but well below what separates starters from contributors in a top-five league. The absence of all sub-score data limits deeper profiling, but the headline numbers point to a player operating near the floor of adequate rather than anywhere near the ceiling.

Why this score

With all six sub-scores null, the FQ score of 53.76 is driven primarily by the per-90 production profile: 0.28 goals and 0.94 key passes per 90 are modest for a striker in Serie A, placing him in the adequate-but-gapped tier rather than a reliable attacking threat. The score confidence of 0.73 means this read is reasonably grounded, not a thin-sample estimate.

Form Trajectory

Form score of 49.23 sits 4.53 points below the FQ score of 53.76 — a soft decline that falls just inside the stable band but trends negative. Recent output is running below his own seasonal average, which is a mild concern rather than an alarm, but the direction is not encouraging.

Similar Profiles
Players with comparable scoring profiles in the same role
André Miguel Valente Silva

Nearly identical FQ scores (53.66 vs 53.76) reflect a similar profile of functional but unspectacular Serie A striker output; Silva's longer top-flight track record provides more sub-score depth than is available here.

Compare →
Rankings
See where this player sits across all scored players.

Top 50 players by TactiQ Score — filter by position, form, and confidence.

Open Rankings →
Compare
Put this player next to another and find the real edges.

TactiQ Score, form, confidence, and season stats compared side by side — instantly.

Compare Player →
Methodology
Understand exactly how this score was built.

Every TactiQ Score is deterministic and traceable. Read the full methodology behind the numbers.

View Methodology →
Latest available season snapshot

Live statistics currently available for this profile

10 metrics surfaced
Appearances
26
Minutes
993
Goals
3
Assists
2
Key passes
11
Rating
6.69
Tackles
3
Shots on target
15
Successful dribbles
6
Clean sheets
8
2 Seasons Ago
TQ 70.6Form 74.1
Previous
TQ 65.3Form 65.2
Current
TQ 61.2Form 61.6
Per 90 minutes
Goals
0.27
Assists
0.18
Key Passes
1.00
Tackles
0.27
Rating
6.69
Jordan Ayew

Ayew's FQ of 51.73 reflects a comparable level of mid-table attacking contribution; Ayew has historically offered more defensive work rate, a dimension that cannot be confirmed or denied for this player given null sub-scores.

Compare →
Patrick Bamford

Bamford's 51.55 FQ score places him in the same typical-performer band, with both players showing limited per-90 goal returns; Bamford's injury history introduces availability risk that is not flagged in this player's data.

Compare →
Current indicators
What the live season sample is surfacing right now
Defensive outcomes
8 clean sheets are surfacing in the current live snapshot.
Strengths
Where this player is genuinely above baseline
No clearly elite traits identified in current data.
Watchpoints
Real gaps relative to this player's role
Goal output

0.28 goals per 90 over 962 minutes is below what Serie A starting strikers typically need to justify consistent selection — this rate projects to roughly 11-12 goals per full season of minutes, a modest ceiling for the position.

Attacking end product

0.09 assists per 90 combined with the low goal rate means direct goal contributions are limited. A key pass rate of 0.94 per 90 suggests some involvement in build-up, but without creation sub-scores it is unclear how much of that translates to genuine chance creation.

Reading the score

What each number means

TactiQ Score

A 0–100 measure of overall quality. Combines statistical output with league difficulty, multi-season weighting, and a consistency factor. Target range for strong players: 70–85.

Form Score

Weighted toward recent matches. Can diverge from the TactiQ Score when current form is meaningfully stronger or weaker than the multi-season average.

Confidence

How much evidence supports this score. Lower confidence means thinner data — fewer seasons, fewer appearances, or gaps in coverage. A provisional score is real signal with appropriate caveats.

Methodology

TactiQ Scores are deterministic — given the same evidence, they produce the same output. The evidence packet system, confidence labels, and publication gate are all explained in full.

Read the full methodology →